<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>navSEO &#187; real-time search result</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.navseo.com/tag/real-time-search-result/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.navseo.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Real-Time Search Result Integration In Google May Have Backfired, Expert Says</title>
		<link>http://www.navseo.com/2010/03/16/real-time-search-result-integration-in-google-may-have-backfired-expert-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navseo.com/2010/03/16/real-time-search-result-integration-in-google-may-have-backfired-expert-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[present real-time results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time search page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time search result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specific real-time results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navseo.com/2010/03/16/real-time-search-result-integration-in-google-may-have-backfired-expert-says/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Bing offer different user experiences with real-time search result integration, and Bas van den Beld at Search Engine Watch says that Bing may have trumped its larger rival&#8217;s implementation. The results of a study conducted by Oneupweb seem to indicate that search engine optimization (SEO) is a more problematic endeavor in Google&#8217;s setup, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b></b>Google and Bing offer different user experiences with real-time search result integration, and Bas van den Beld at Search Engine Watch says that Bing may have trumped its larger rival&#8217;s implementation.<br />
The results of a study conducted by Oneupweb seem to indicate that search engine optimization (SEO) is a more problematic endeavor in Google&#8217;s setup, which integrates real-time results into the core natural search page. The eye tracking experiment Oneupweb performed shows that consumers don&#8217;t spend a great deal of their time and attention on the real-time results provided.
<p>Bing, on the other hand, provides users with a separate real-time search page and does present real-time results amid the standard ones. According to van den Beld, &#8220;it could be that Bing has struck gold. In the future, users might turn to that specific page showing specific real-time results.&#8221;</p>
<p>Integrating social media networks and other real-time content into search engine optimization (SEO) efforts is a priority for most SEO practitioners, but opinions vary widely on the proper way to implement such a function.<img alt="ADNFCR-1513-ID-19672278-ADNFCR" src="http://feeds.directnews.co.uk/feedtrack/justcopyright.gif?feedid=1513&#038;itemid=19672278" /></p>
</p>
<p>Source: <a href=http://www.brafton.com/industry-news/real-time-search-result-integration-in-google-may-have-backfired-expert-says-$1365699.htm>www.brafton.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navseo.com/2010/03/16/real-time-search-result-integration-in-google-may-have-backfired-expert-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

